I have a different take on this. My brothers and I went to boarding school and our experience was benign. I do not think that someone can say that “all boarding schools should be closed” or “people should not be missionaries if they have to send their children away.” No system is perfect and God works in many ways.
Please understand that nothing said here is intended to discount the pain caused by Fanda. This is a thread on Are Boarding Schools Healthy? Well yes, some are.
My brother is a counselor to sex-offenders. He says that it is much less likely to find sexual predators in mission schools (because of the screening) than in American schools, churches, colleges, sports teams, and neighborhoods. No amount of attention from a parent can keep a child safe all the time. It can’t be done. My friend was sexually abused by her youth pastor while her parents slept in the room next door. Further, parents are sometimes the problem. My brother says the most dangerous words in the English language, for a child, are “my mother’s boyfriend.” Sexual predators are sneaky, nasty, and wicked. But keeping the kids at home won't necessarily keep them safe.
My brothers and I discussed why our boarding school was healthy and came up with several things.
1. It was run by a group of missions. Each mission supplied X number of teachers per X number of students and had boarding facilities for its children. There was “peer pressure” to provide good teachers and houseparents. No mission ran all the financial risk, so there was not the big pressure from the mission to send the kids. If parents wanted to home-school, that was fine. If they wanted to send their children to a different school, that was fine. All the mission requested was enough advanced notice to let it adjust personnel at the school.
2. In our mission, the parents and kid decided when to send the kid to the Hostel. Most kids went about 4th grade, but some went later. None went earlier; the moms home-schooled. But the main reason for boarding school was socialization for the kids. We got pretty bored in the tribe, particularly at the Jr.High and High School ages. We would have felt bad if our social needs forced our parents to return to America (we liked the country), so this was a fair compromise. The other reason for the boarding school was to teach us in the U.S. (vs. European) curriculum so we could go to US universities.
3. The vacations were set so that we were never away from home longer than three months at a time. We were home at least four months out of the year. For many of my peers (though not all) that was enough time at home.
4. The hostel was run by a council of parents that was independent of the field council, though they consulted with the field chairman at times. There were guest rooms in the hostel and parents often stayed there for special events at the school or special birthdays. In my brother’s day, there was an eccentric house parent family, not evil, just weird. They were gone in a year, though their deeds are still remembered in song and story.
5. Our mission recruited houseparents specifically. That was their mission, to support the missionaries up-country by taking good care of the children. It is much the same idea as MAF being missionary support. Neither my brothers nor I can remember a houseparent striking a child, though some yelled. One house father came close to hitting my little brother. To his credit, he mastered his temper and admittedly, my brother can be provoking. That house father has since apologized to my brother and they have been reconciled.
No system is perfect. The mission should provide a variety of options and let the parents and children decide.
|