The Executive Board of New Tribes Mission, Inc. did not wake up one morning and decide that, there being so little else to do this week, this would be a good time to seek some kind of resolution of the abuse "allegations" swirling around the mission. They had, in fact, always been aware of both the "allegations" (which they knew to be true) and the fact that some victims were not satisfied with how NTM had handled things "prior to 1994."
What had happened was that a particular group of determined women who had been abused when children living in NTM dorms in Fanda, Senegal, were making a lot of noise and attracting some attention. Due to the pervasive influence of the internet, this whole thing was becoming a public relations nightmare. "We don't know what else we can do," was no longer a sufficient response to victims' agony.
Hands up, everybody who thinks that NTM's primary goal in bringing in G.R.A.C.E. was to provide justice, closure, restitution or any other positive good to the victims. No takers?
So, does anyone think that NTM wants to do whatever it must, and as little as it can, to limit the damage this issue causes to the mission, both financially and in terms of public relations? Well, let's ask Andy Kline, someone who is working these days to clean up a mess he did not make: "NTM leaders dare not be reckless with the mission." Thank you, Andy. I see that hand. No one would have believed it if I had been the one to say it.
Victims and their supporters need to be aware that the goal of NTM is the same, whether they have contracted G.R.A.C.E. or Pat Hendrix or are defending themselves in civil court in Sanford, Florida: To limit the damage, to prevent future loss and to maintain a positive public image for NTM. To be blunt about it, all those who press a complaint against NTM, whether this complaint is being handled by an outside agency or through the legal system are, by virtue of their complaints, in an adversarial relationship with NTM. NTM is not on your side; they are on their side, understandably enough.
Victims need to know what to expect and be clear on what they want. NTM is not going to help with this; the fact that they want nondisclosure agreements is proof that they want to keep other victims in the dark regarding possible outcomes. As nice as the CPC people are, they are not able to help with this.
You could start by reading the G.R.A.C.E. report and seeing what progress NTM has made in implementing the recommendations it made. This should be a sobering exercise.
If you are working with Pat Hendrix, you need to ask her specific questions about what outcomes you can reasonably look for. She has had experience with other investigations and will be able to answer your questions.
Of course, there are other options. You can read about one of them on the first post of this thread. Contacting this firm does not obligate you in any way. And, doing so may help you solidify things in your own mind.
|