MK forum

I suspect the deal would be something like this. "Yes there was a few bad people in the past, but it would be hard to prove in court and it is all historical taking place in a far off country, so you have little chance of winning, so why don't we just give you a little incentive ($$) and you go away and never mention this again".

Next.

Trouble is, while Fanda may have closed down other schools haven't and by not having a full exposure the spotlight is turned off on the possibility that nothing has changed.
Who can put their hand on their heart and say "there is no abuse occuring now"? For that to be true, the environment that gave rise to the scandal in the first place would have to be completely dismantled and strict checks and balances put in place. And has that happened?

NO! NO! NO!
The same people are in place.
Outside suggestions are not being taken.
They have not, to our knowledge, analyzed their leadership style
With the help of people who know what is right and what is toxic.
(ie: T.J. Addington)
It would be impossible to re-do anything
With the current structure
And leaders.
They have too much to hide
To be honest.

In other words---
All the closets
Need to be opened.
No more secrets!

In my career I often get to fix up those who have self evaluated and got it wrong, i.e. developed chest pain and passed it off as indigestion, then got to the hospital far to late.

By standing on the periphery or outside one can gain a much better perspective of what the whole picture is.

There probably needs to be a balance between getting feedback from an outside perspective and from self-evaluation. Probably good to get both perspectives so as to get the best picture possible, no?

Right.
Remembering how deceptive the heart is.
Also......