MK forum

I guess the lawyers will have to amend their suits to include Global Assist Campus at defendants now.

For people who talk about putting a plane together while its flying
And say the train is on the track so you had better get on
And then it doesn't go anywhere-----
Well, they probably need Scott Ross.
But still……….

But what are all the MKs who have been sitting on the fence waiting for the big payouts to start before they decide to speak up going to do now?

Bit obvious that NTM is going to claim it has no money, in fact it will make itself disappear and the new entity won't be liable for any of NTMs past. Of course it will all be one big fat lie, because it will still have the same members, the same leaders and the same real estate!!!!!!!!!

And so those MKs who are sitting on the fence and figured when the court cases start going against NTM and settlements start it will be time to come forward and claim some of the hard earned cash that they feel they are entitled too, are going to find that the cupboard is bare!!!!!!!!

The cupboard was always going to be bare folks, just look at who has the keys. This is and never was about money, this is about justice and the cupboards aren't bare on that account and NTM is dropping the keys into hands that can open the doors and let the skeletons out.

IT'S TIME FOR THE FENCE SITTERS TO GET OFF THEIR BACKSIDES!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Here is a ray of sunshine in this bleak situation...

NTM would not be taking these steps if they didn't feel their entire organization was in danger of financial collapse. No one in NTM would support NTM's taking these steps if they didn't believe that their daily bread was at stake.

NTM is clearing moving to limit their legal liability, either by settling, stalling or shenanigans such as Global Partners. In any case, it is a tacit admission that they have an indefensible position. Or, in plain language, they are guilty as charged!

Good job, MKs!

Thanks, Gene
Was waiting to hear from you!

I recently read an article in the Boston Globe by Dan Shaughnessy that discussed the issue of the NFL hiring former FBI director Robert Mueller to conduct independent investigations following the Ray Rice scandal.

Here is a few quotes from the article:

“But this investigation is already compromised and will remain compromised because, despite Mueller’s long and impressive career, his position as a partner at the WilmerHale law firm demonstrates an enormous conflict of interest regarding any investigation involving the NFL.

“Of course this is going to be a tank job,’’ said Michael Albano, former four-term mayor of Springfield and current member of the Massachusetts Governor’s Council. “It’s a conflict of interest to use that law firm."

“The NFL must think people are stupid or foolish. Apparently they are the only law firm in the country. Are you kidding me?’’

I began to wonder how the public would react if the conflict of interest was a bit deeper. What if an NFL “in-house” attorney co-founded a firm where many of the independent investigators are chosen? What if the NFL had one of their own on the board of directors of the firm? Would that be a conflict? What if two of the board members were also conducting the independent investigations?

Well, in the world of NTM the term “independent” is used loosely at best (in my opinion). We know that Child Safety Protection Network (CSPN) was co-founded by Scott Ross. However, what many don’t know is that two of the CSPN board members, Richard Ramirez and Jim Richter, were both part of the group that did the Vianopolis investigation. In the past few weeks the CSPN board of directors has been updated and no longer indicates the above individuals but one person remains: Tibby Westcott (Board Member and Director).

See: https://mycpa.cpa.state.tx.us/coa/servl ... 2048810272

Click on “Officers and Directors Information.” If this link fails you can google “Texas Corporation Search” which will take you to the mycpa website.

Just thought you should know.