MK forum

YES, BONNIE AND KARI!

HERE'S TO YOU BOTH. THANK YOU SO MUCH FOR GIVING US ALL A VOICE!!!!

CHEERS!

2 1/2 years for the first 1/2 mil 1year for the 2nd 1/2 YEEHAH BONNIE AND KARI!!!

The current rate of views is just over 2500 per day. So in aproximately 400 days the next million will be reached.

The conclusion I have reached for this rapid rate of views is because of Magpies. Either Magpies can read and are seeing what us MKs are up to, or the more likely explanation is MKs are checking up to see what those Magpies are up to, their flight paths e.t.c.

There could of course be another perfectly legitimate explanation, but it hasn't crossed my mind yet .

LURKERS
And it used to be around 1,000 views a day.
People are getting nervous.
Not just about magpies.

Lurkers welcome, after all it would take a very hardened person to read the stories on this and not be moved.
Bemused would also like to welcome NTM supporters in Australasia, who have now joined us and are no doubt busy debating to deny all or duck for cover. Hi DAD
You were given every opportunity for the last 30 years to discuss this in private, but you refused, now the whole world has an opportunity to read about what really happened. And maybe somewhere, someone will learn from our messy saga and not let it happen to their family.

The lovely Mrs Bemused and I sat down and watched the DVD "All Gods Children" together last night. It gave her a sad insight into what my childhood was like and the warped thinking of the particular mission involved.
One thing she commented on was how similar the road taken by the mission concerned was to our own dilemma. Notice how fresh leadership is brought in to blame the old leadership. Notice how an independent investigation is commissioned, but recommendations were not followed, no abuser was brought before the justice system. Then the final insult, the mission wrote to the former staff of the boarding school and apologised for their names being soiled, even though the independent investigating team stated that all staff were involved with the culture of abuse.

Wasn't that letter of 1997 all about abuse of one sort or another? That is how I saw it. I have said that NTM had a great training program, a very good methodology in "The Cron," but the forgot what made the mission what is was - the people who sold out to Christ for something they believed in, then get to the field and find out that the NTM on the field was not the NTM that was presented in the training.

I understand that it is good company/organization policy to let the people have their say when issues arise. Let the people air their grievances so to speak in order to take the sting out of the issues and present a face of concern/understanding. Also provides them with more time to dance around the issues. (Are NTMers still not allowed to dance?.....shuffle then. You may hear this sort of terminology used by the organization.

"We hear what you are saying"....which actually means..(we don't care what you're saying and in my scheme of things you're a pest)

"We understand your concerns"...which actually means..(we don't care what you are saying and I'm tired of hearing about your issues)

"We would like everyone to put their concerns in writing and submit it to their area manager".....
which actually means....(That will give us another 3 months before they go feral on us again!)



ALL OFFERINGS WELCOME!

I think you hit the nail on the head, Radioshack, when you say, "present a face." From my understanding thus far, that is about all NTM has done: present a face, and that my friends is called hypocrisy!

Another trivial question. For decades I've had the same reoccuring dream, where I can't escape the boarding school I attended and I'm stuck far older than I should be still attending school and listening to the endless nonsense. However in the last couple of weeks the dreams have changed to a format where I'm in charge of the situation and I get revenge on the tormentors of the past.
Anyone else had similar shifts in nocturnal enlightenments? And any ideas if this is normal? I'm interpreting it as a resolution process, which my learned other half agrees with (so it must be right).