MK forum

It's a very interesting idea and worth exploring. Obviously I'm out of the equation due to not being a U.S. citizen, but I'm happy to help in any small way I can.

It might be a complete fizzer, but you will never know unless you ask and ask you have. On the other hand you could well be on to something.
Governments will do the right thing if they are given a strong reason for doing so, this I know because I've managed to do it myself. You need two things, a well worded approach and a bit of luck that the approach ends up on the desk of someone who will do something about it.
In respect to the last bit, my advice is always go high up the chain of command and make it something that grabs their attention.

What about exploring what responsibilities the U.S. Govt has towards the children of it's diplomatic and military personnel who serve overseas and then drawing a parallel? President Obama issued a statement regarding the behaviour of military personnel on overseas duty recently, so the subject is topical.

No flies on you Jerry. It's just another example of why NTM, IHART, Crossview, Ex Tribers who still kiss the backside of NTM cannot be trusted to tell the truth. If they are persisting with this blatant lie, what else are they lying about?

O.k. Kyle, you've got my support too. Doing nothing is the easy option. Attempting to do something even when you get knocked back takes courage.
Don't know much about suing either, but do know that NTM has lost it's legal battles when it has been sued in the past, despite their legal expertise. So the precedent is set.

As I have said before, we had a couple who were with NTM in Rooty Hill come to our church when we lived in Sydney, (they had to get special permission because we aren't normal, ha, ha) they were NTM at the time not Crossview, would that give us any right to seek info from them? Full stop.

KyleJ, I'm wondering if military kids get all those rights because they are on military bases,, known to be "owned" by the US. Would that make a difference?