I can't speak for others, but I come here often to look for news, for hope. I don't know what to say, so I leave, but I can at least say that I still support the victims, still long for justice for you.
When I read this on the Wartburg Watch today, I couldn't help but think of you and the frequency with which IHART has used this same tactic.
Quote:
The “can’t talk” rule has this thinking behind it: ‘The real problem cannot be exposed because then it would have to be dealt with and things would have to change so it must be protected behind the walls of silence (neglect) or by assault (legalistic attack).
Take a look at the SGC response to Rachel Denhollander. See if you see the *Can’t Talk* rule in play. In the following statement, SGC claims not to have shared details of the raised concerns in order to *protect the victims.” I sincerely doubt that many of the victims and their families have ever felt *protected* by SGC/SGM/CJ Mahaney and his consiglieres.
Over the past few years, we have regularly shared details on these matters privately with those who have approached us in good faith with understandable concerns. However, in our public statements, we have been reluctant to share many details concerning these accusations. Far from hiding facts, we have sought to be discreet in our communications to protect those involved—first and foremost victims and their families.
Full article here.
http://thewartburgwatch.com/2018/03/05/how-sovereign-grace-churches-and-highpoint-church-demonstrate-the-abusive-cant-talk-rule/<3 SkyeBlue
Login
Register
FAQ
Search
