Our house was destroyed in the earthquake (I was in it at the time, rather scary). It took 3 days for the authorities to decide that it was not safe to live there and we were evicted and never returned. We slept under a table in the safest part of the house till we moved. The only person to now live in the depopulated part of the street is the man on the video clip. He is in my opinion, a complete nutter. He has been told to leave but refuses.
What is interesting is what happens in a natural disaster. People react very differently. Some people who lost everything, immediately helped others. Some who had little damage, looked after themselves and declined to help others. The media goes after the sensational aspects of the event and will find the first person who is willing to talk to air their version of events, this is often completely inaccurate. Politicians will promise the world will be put right, but then suffer amnesia.
And now I have a dilemma. I cycled over to have a look at this latest boulders path down the hill. It was pretty obvious where it went, as there are big trees snapped like tooth picks. However there was a tree down that the boulder cannot have been responsible for and there I found another boulder that has been held up by the trees. The reason I found it, is because I know that hill intimately, after 30 years of making it into a forest. This boulder is in a line considerably closer to the man in the clips house and will come down with the next shake, rain or just because it feels like it. So what do I do? I'm wasting my time arguing with someone who still thinks he is not in danger, so do I let nature take its course and possibly improve the gene pool? Do I inform the media, who will swarm all over the place and make a sensatonal story of it? Or do I call an expert?
|