Well, Pamela, I hear what you are saying. I think it reflects on the morals and values of the postmodern world in which we live. However, leaders need to be held to a higher standard. Anyone may correct me if I am mistaken, but it seems that the old policy was that if any missionary was guilty of immorality, BEING THE AGGRESSOR, he/she was dismissed from NTM and never allowed to return. The victim, after being out a time and going back through part of the training, could return. We have three examples of that in Tambo, Rich Hine, Bob Fisher and Terri McCall. All three where out. Though if Rich had problems in Paraguay, how did he get back in the door to Bolivia.
I believe it was in the mid-eighties when Jim Bakker fell from grace, and the fact that so many wanted him to stay on afterwards and even after he was released from prison, reflects on the lack of maturity of believers who do not understand the standard for leaders. I think some of what we read on this forum/these threads reflect also on the standard to which we feel the leaders should be held accountable, and by not acting on these abuses of which they had knowledge, we as a support group of the victims of abuse, want the leaders held accountable.
I remember what my pastor said at the time of Jim Baker's demise, "If you (the congregation) learn that I have been unfaithful to my wife, you have an obligation to put me out of the church. I would be no longer worthy of being your pastor."
Radioshack, I hear what you are saying. Forgiveness does not mean that everything returns to normal as before, whether it be the moral infidelity of a pastor - or of a husband. Forgiveness can take place, but should TAKE YEARS before the confidence is reestablished. Forgiveness does not automatically erase the consequences of the wrong. That is a total misunderstanding of the concept of forgiveness.
When David sinned against Bathsheba and Urias, he was confronted by the prophet Nathan. David recognized and confessed his sin. "I have sinned against God." But let's look at the high price David paid for his sin. 1- His baby died. 2- His son by one wife raped his half-sister, Tamar. 3- Absolom avenged his sister's disgrace by killing his half-brother. 4- Absolom rebelled and gained the heart of the people. (David did nothing.) 5- David fled from his son rather than confront him. 6. Absolom slept with David's concubines in plain sight of all Israel. 7- Joab killed Absolom against David's orders.
I do not believe that God orchistrated all these events to punish David. This could be called Collateral Damage. David paid a high price for his sin. Why does NTM think that the abusers of children should walk free? Those leaders have no concept of the high standard that God demands of leaders. I have been out of touch with what goes on in the US, so am not aware of instances, but what you say does not surprise me.
|