On September 4th, 2010 at 00:53, a poster signing him/herself "Fanda MK" posted this on the "about" page:
I read this report, and was saddened to find that it is riddled with inaccuracies and absolute false testimony. While there are sections that are true, there are large portions of the report that are absolutely false, poorly researched, and show absolute incompetence by those handling the report to ensure that the truth was told. It amazed me that, they couldn’t even bother to get the names of some people correct, while in other cases they made accusation without ever researching the accused or supposed victims. In the end, the report has become a “Fanda Witch Hunt” and serves a great injustice to the real victims.
Several replies have been posted there, but maybe this is a complex enough issue to have its own thread here. Generally speaking, generalizations are not generally helpful, and Fanda MK's comment, while having the unquestioned asset of brevity, is too general to be convincing.
Like many of the others who have responded, I would like to know who the "real victims" are.
I would also like to know what inaccuracies Fanda MK has found in the report. In which cases (note the plural, as per Fanda MK) was an accusation made without ever researching the accused or supposed victims?
GRACE, according to Fanda MK, couldn't get the names of some people correct. Does this mean spelling errors, as on page 44, footnote 325, where Bill Keele's name is spelled "Keel"? Or is it more substantive?
|