Who knows what is really true anymore. What we do know as fact is:
1) Child abuse occured within NTM on a large scale. 2) It was covered up by people at the top of NTM organisation. 3) Very few of the multitude of paedophiles have seen justice.
What is a grey area is:
1) Who is doing what about the issue and why. 2) What are the motives for actions or inactions related to this. 3) Who has been told not to say anything about the issue and by who.
Given fact 2) and the non resolution of fact 3), then it is up to NTM to act in such a way that earns the trust of the agrieved parties (namely MKs).
Fact 1) should never have occured, Fact 2) should also never have occured and blaming Fact 3) on external sources is hardly consistent with an organisation that professes it believes in miracles.
The grey area is only exacerbating the mess caused by the given facts and only gives rise to more suspicion and distrust. That an organisation with a history of being economical with the truth and covering up criminal activity, is now asking that those it has offended against to trust them with their most personal details via a commissioned subsidiary is a large call. This is a very large organisation, with a lot at stake and considerable resources to defend their actions and delay justice if they choose to take that path. Because there is so much grey area, one is best advised to act with caution and/or seek the counsel of those who one trusts.
|