NTM gladly suffers statements from its own hierarchy that would be scorned if it came from "charismatics." I refer you to earlier posts on this thread about Paul Fleming's "mantle" falling on Ken Johnston. Benny Hin would be hard pressed to top that one, but if he even came close he would be roundly rebuked in NTM circles.
Of course, "our friends" in other ministries can say similar things and we all "know what they mean" and it's fine.
Campus Crusade for Christ recently changed their name. Their vice president for the US attributed the name change to God: "We believe wholeheartedly that God has given us this new name." (Press release here: http://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/campus-crusade-for-christ-adopts-new-name-cru-125862368.html)
What could they possibly mean by this statement? Yet, it is of a piece with NTM's frequent statements that God led them to do this or that: to change the name of Brown Gold to NTM@Work, to implement certain policies, to have a grace restoration revival, to investigate their boarding schools and (probably at the time) to burn incriminating evidence.
I remember at NTBI we had to have permission to get engaged. Permission from the school leaders, I mean, not our parents. So, I duly wrote out a request to get engaged. It was something like this: Mary and I love one another and want to get married, a decision supported by our parents.
A staff lady suggested that I "put a little more about the Lord in there." I declined; it seemed to me that if a Christian couldn't see the Lord in marriage they hadn't been reading their Bible.
In any case, attributing human decisions to God is merely a way of avoiding personal or corporate responsibility. It is poor theology at its best!
|