There is a fine line between waiting for proper legal channels to be utilized and genuine response from the heart. Much of the problem lies in attempting to keep the spirit of Matthew 18 with the knowledge that much in the past was simply ignored, covered up, or manipulated to make the victim the sinner.
Having the benefit of a legal education myself, I understand that once the summons have been issued, it is awfully hard to undo the process. Yes, one can drop the lawsuit, settle out of court, and whatnot, but in this "information age", the very fact one is filed is enough. So, while not condoning past sinful actions or responses, I can also see why, apparently, it appears there is much nonchalance from NTM. I also understand why OT feels the need to "light a fire" a la Nero to NTM and its enablers, handlers, etc. I have to admit, after reading many of these stories, I don't feel the need to cut anyone in leadership much slack.
Oh, and as an aside to anonymity . . .I have to admit, I think the percentage is much higher than 80% of those who know who we, the posters, are. I mean, c'mon. . . .it doesn't take a Sherlock Holmes to figure out who we really are. Between the numerous instances where dates are given out, experiences on (and off) the "Land" are referenced, and countless "I think I know who you are" phrases are used, I'm guessing many will not be fooled by the use of "nom-de-plumes". If, as OT is fond of pointing out, there is a mole, I'm sure that mole already knows and has communicated such to his/her masters. Honestly, at this point, does it make a difference? We know who "they" are, and it is likely "they" know who we are.
Yes, "hurt-n-hopeful", they may be dealing with an avalanche of investigations and severely understaffed (which is a comment in and of itself!), GRACE may need more time to wade through the present recommendations before instigating yet another investigation. However, I would think that one or both of the entities would AT LEAST begin the process of compiling evidence, talking to the abusees, and letting people know there WILL be an investigation rather than clam up about it all citing their privileges under the Fifth Amendment (no, they haven't actually cited, but seeming inaction does warrant that impression).
On the flip-side, what CAN be done other than reporting such abuses to the proper authorities, meaning local, state, federal, or international? Can a civil lawsuit, at this time, be initiated? Would that be practicable? Would the impending threat to do so serve as an effective prod to NTM to "haul ass" and do something, anything, NOW?
Game the scenario . . . .
|