I have been reading this panel and I feel like an MK again. I say again because in my mind I had left that weird world behind ages ago, but now it's back. When I was a teenager I was considered rebellious and I'm glad I was because it made me reject evil covered up with religious talk. I was a very angry teenager but that got me going out of the morass. One thing I always asked was why did MKs have to be the cannon fodder of the Kingdom? Why were our lives expendible in order to save little Rawalpindi or whoever? The type of discourse that was used at Mamou and is documented in the film All God's Children was common when I was growing up. According to the system, the only thing that mattered was furthering the Kingdom, the children of the missionaries be damned. As well, I learned that missions are corporations and the corporation must go on, no matter who is injured in the process. In my opinion, that's why Reginaldo Goulart was not fired and why Frank Parker was silently removed, no explanations given. When it's to the benefit of the corporation, Jesus' words about forgiveness come into play. When it's the powerful ones forcing the victim to forgive, you really have to begin to see the power equation behind the discourse. The Bible, on the otherhand, is always on the side of the socially powerless - the orphan, the widow, children. Remember Jesus's words, it's best to have stone tied to your neck and be thrown into the lake then to harm one of these little ones.
|