Couldn’t agree more. Thanks for sharing your thoughts, Dale!

Don’t Drink the Koolaid, Kids!

NTM wake up you want to control everything that happens in your families, but what about the families of the molesters. Doesn’t that molester by his act of molesting children ruin his relationship with his wife? Or do you think wives are just suppose to take it and forgive also? What about his kids, does he molest them too? It would not be unusual. You need to protect them too.

What I meant was that it is impossible to think of any words, any combination of words equal to the horror I felt when I read “Now that we know what the law requires, we cannot be silent.” – NTM Executive Committee

Profanity would blush before such a statement. It is inadequate to the task. The mild hyperbole that was used to introduce this article is nothing compared to what is required.

Please, NTM, tell us when this was published. Was I in NTM when that came out? Did I read it and do nothing? I am disgusted with myself, ashamed of myself. Did I really work for a mission that would say this?

I am wondering where you have found this information. Is it hearsay, or fact? Only a few WEEKS ago, I was told by someone in leadership in NTM that the offender was at that moment, still with NTM-Brasil. So. Either I was misinformed, or as you say, this offender was dismissed, OR the offender was dismissed AFTER NTM was called out on harboring him. Which is it?
If it is the latter, which I am assuming, then whoop-dee-doo.
The point is, they allowed him to stay, after he confessed to abusing a girl – WHO CARES that the girl and her family preferred to not talk about it? The fact is, NTM knew that he was a child molester, moved him to Brasil with that knowledge, and kept him for years.
It makes no difference now, if he’s been dismissed. Once again, too little too late.
Thankyou, though, for looking into it. Seeking truth is what we are all about.

BTW, In Internet slang, a troll is someone who posts controversial, inflammatory, irrelevant or off-topic messages in an online community, such as an online discussion forum, chat room or blog, with the primary intent of provoking other users into an emotional or disciplinary response[1] or of otherwise disrupting normal on-topic discussion.

Not the kind who lives under a bridge and eats goats.

My point exactly; Let NTM’s words speak for themselves.

Allen:

Let’s get beyond this–Yes, hyperbole is a legitimate figure of speech, but honestly, from an outside perspective, using it in this way, it comes across as grandstanding–Yes, I know that wasn’t the intention, but it does come across that way. And yes, of course we can express disgust at crap like this, but doing it in an appropirate way-

I am not wanting to get into a flame war–All I wanted to do was express concern of how it was coming across.

Your’e welcome to take it or leave it.

Quote from Anonymous: “So why go down the road of hyperbole and vindictiveness?”
Hyperbole is a legitimate figure of speech. There’s nothing vindictive about express disgust at stuff like this.